# Find the technical barriers between your pages and search.

> Important pages missing from Google? Conflicting canonical tags? A JavaScript website that looks fine to visitors but renders differently for search engines? I trace the problem from the affected URLs to the template, configuration or publishing process behind it.

[Original page](https://ramfaseo.se/en/services/technical-seo/)

Language: en. Publisher: Ramfa SEO. Public content reference; navigation and visual presentation are omitted.

## Who this is for

For marketing and development teams that need to understand why organic search is underperforming, or want a technical review before a redesign. The work covers WordPress, WooCommerce, Shopify and custom websites, including Next.js.

## What we work on

- Discovery and indexation: robots rules, XML sitemaps, status codes, canonical selection and Search Console evidence.
- Rendered content: compare the initial HTML and browser output, including navigation, metadata and JavaScript dependencies.
- Architecture: category depth, internal links, pagination, duplicate URLs and parameter combinations.
- Implementation risk: affected templates, development ownership, release order and checks that prove a fix worked.

## What you receive

- A prioritized issue register with example URLs, business relevance and a clear next action.
- Implementation specifications for your developers, or agreed fixes carried out directly.
- Before-and-after technical checks and a follow-up plan for indexation and search performance.

## Planning the scope

An audit is scoped to your site and available data. Search engine processing and rankings cannot be scheduled or guaranteed; technical acceptance and commercial outcomes are measured separately.

## Planning this service for your site

### A sensible starting point

If the cause is unknown, start with a focused investigation of affected page types. If the issue is already confirmed, scope the fix and its verification instead of repeating a full audit.

### What to prepare

Share example URLs, when the problem appeared, recent releases and any available Search Console reports. Read-only access may be enough for investigation; it does not require permission to change the site.

### What changes the scope

Rendering, server rules, template variation and developer availability affect the work. A crawl report alone does not include implementing every issue it finds.

### How to review the handover

Each priority should identify affected pages, evidence, an action and a way to check it. For implemented fixes, compare the agreed technical checks before and after release; an indexing request is not proof of indexing.

## A clear way to move from diagnosis to delivery

### Understand

We review the website, your commercial priorities and the decision you need to make.

### Define

You receive a scope with priorities, responsibilities and concrete deliverables.

### Implement

I work directly on agreed changes or collaborate with your development and content teams.

### Verify

We check the implementation and agree how to follow search and business outcomes.

## Questions worth asking before you choose an SEO partner

### Can you implement the fixes as well as audit the website?

Yes. We can agree an audit, implementation or a combined engagement. Each change has an owner and an acceptance check, so the report does not become an unassigned task list.

### Do you work with Next.js and JavaScript websites?

Yes. I investigate server-rendered content, client-side dependencies, routing, metadata, status codes and the links available to crawlers. Recommendations reflect how your application is actually built.

### Why are some pages crawled but not indexed?

That status describes an outcome, not a single diagnosis. I compare the affected pages with indexed examples and inspect duplication, canonical signals, content usefulness, internal links and rendering.

### What access is useful?

The site address and a description of the problem are enough for the first conversation. Search Console, analytics and a staging environment may be requested later with access limited to the agreed work.

### What should an actionable audit contain?

Specific affected URLs, evidence, priority, a proposed correction, an implementation owner and a way to verify the result. A long export of tool warnings is not the deliverable.

## How to choose a service and plan the work

[Choose the work your site actually needs](https://ramfaseo.se/en/services/)

## Sources and language versions

- [SV original](https://ramfaseo.se/tjanster/teknisk-seo/)
- [EN original](https://ramfaseo.se/en/services/technical-seo/)
- [FA original](https://ramfaseo.se/fa/services/technical-seo/)